Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVleeshouwers, Jolien
dc.contributor.authorFløvik, Lise
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Jan Olav
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Håkon Andre
dc.contributor.authorFinne, Live Bakke
dc.contributor.authorMohr, Benedicte
dc.contributor.authorJørgensen, Ingrid Løken
dc.contributor.authorLunde, Lars-Kristian
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T07:26:23Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T07:26:23Z
dc.date.created2022-08-16T14:04:44Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2022, 95 (10), 2025-2051.
dc.identifier.issn0340-0131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3146175
dc.description.abstractObjective Telework from home (TWFH) has become routine for many, yet research on how this may affect the psychosocial work environment is sparse. To understand the effects that TWFH may have on the psychosocial work environment, this systematic literature review identified, evaluated, and summarized findings on the association of TWFH with factors of the psychosocial work environment. Methods Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Amed, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The topic of the study reflected TWFH, and subjects should be office workers employed at a company. Outcomes should reflect psychosocial work environment factors. Inclusion criteria stated that studies should be primary, quantitative, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. English language publications dating from January 2010 to February 2021 were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) and quality of overall evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results Searches resulted in 3354 publications, and after screening rounds 43 peer-reviewed original studies satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Fourteen individual psychosocial work environment outcome categories were studied. Limited overall evidence to support effects of TWFH on the included work environment outcomes, with evidence being rated either of low or very low quality. Flexibility and autonomy are discussed as potential mediating variables in the relationship between TWFH and the psychosocial work environment. Conclusion There is a lack of high-quality research investigating effects of TWFH on the psychosocial work environment. To suggest TWFH guidelines or recommendations, there is a need for research with high-quality longitudinal designs, precise measures of time use and location of work, and validated measures of factors known to be of importance.
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleThe relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
dc.title.alternativeThe relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber2025-2051
dc.source.volume95
dc.source.journalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4
dc.identifier.cristin2043473
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record