Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClemm, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFærden, Karl
dc.contributor.authorUlvestad, Bente
dc.contributor.authorLunde, Lars-Kristian
dc.contributor.authorNordby, Karl-Christian
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-20T06:43:42Z
dc.date.available2024-08-20T06:43:42Z
dc.date.created2020-02-17T18:33:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationOccupational and Environmental Medicine. 2020, 77 188-193.
dc.identifier.issn1351-0711
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3147033
dc.description.abstractBackground Testing of vibration perception threshold (VPT) at the fingertips as a quantitative measure of tactile sensitivity is a commonly used tool in diagnosing hand–arm vibration syndrome. There is limited research on dose–response relationships between hand–arm vibration (HAV) exposure and VPT on an individual level. Aims Assess possible dose–response relationships on an individual level between HAV exposure and VPT at the fingertips. Methods We assessed average daily vibration exposure (m/s2A8) and cumulative lifetime HAV exposure for 104 participants from different departments in a road maintenance company based on vibration measurements and questionnaires. VPT was measured based on the technical method described in ISO 13091-1:2005 using octave frequencies 8–500 Hz. We investigated associations using linear regression models with significance level p≤0.05. Results The participants were either exposed to rock drills (n=33), impact wrenches (n=52) or none of these tools (n=19). Exposure to rock drills and impact wrenches was associated with elevated VPT for all seven test frequencies in the second and fifth fingers of both hands. A dose–response with the daily exposure measure m/s2(A8) was found based on 1.2 m/s2(A8) for impact wrenches, and 5.4 m/s2(A8) for rock drills. A stronger association was found with the cumulative exposure for rock drills compared with impact wrenches, and for the second finger compared with the fifth finger. Conclusions HAV exposure was associated with elevated VPT, also at exposure levels below the common exposure action value of 2.5 m/s2(A8). Lowering the HAV exposure can contribute to prevent increasing VPTs in these workers.
dc.description.abstractDose-response relationship between hand-arm vibration exposure and vibrotactile thresholds among roadworkers
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleDose-response relationship between hand-arm vibration exposure and vibrotactile thresholds among roadworkers
dc.title.alternativeDose-response relationship between hand-arm vibration exposure and vibrotactile thresholds among roadworkers
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber188-193
dc.source.volume77
dc.source.journalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/oemed-2019-105926
dc.identifier.cristin1795003
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record