Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNikkilä, Rayan
dc.contributor.authorCarpén, Timo
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Johnni
dc.contributor.authorHeikkinen, Sanna
dc.contributor.authorLynge, Elsebeth
dc.contributor.authorMartinsen, Jan Ivar
dc.contributor.authorSelander, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorMehlum, Ingrid Sivesind
dc.contributor.authorTorfadottir, Jóhanna Eyrún
dc.contributor.authorMäkitie, Antti
dc.contributor.authorPukkala, Eero
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T13:54:56Z
dc.date.available2024-11-19T13:54:56Z
dc.date.created2024-08-27T12:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Epidemiology. 2024, 53 (4), 1-11.
dc.identifier.issn0300-5771
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3165567
dc.description.abstractBackground The impact of societal factors on the occurrence of head and neck cancers (HNCs) remains understudied, especially in the Nordic countries. Methods To quantify the association between socio-economic status (SES) and the occurrence of HNCs, this cohort study uses data from the Nordic Occupational Cancer project that combine occupational and cancer registry data from 1961 to 2005 of 14.9 million individuals aged between 30 and 64 years. Occupational categories were combined into seven socio-economic categories. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) analyses were conducted with the cancer incidence rates for the entire national study populations used as reference rates. Results Altogether, 83 997 HNCs—72% in men and 28% in women—were recorded. Among men, a gradient of risk associated with SES was observed for cancers of the tongue, other oral cavity subsites, pharynx, oropharynx and larynx in groups with lower SES. Managers showed decreased SIRs of 0.50 to –0.90 also for cancers of the lip, tongue, other oral cavity subsites, oropharynx, nasopharynx, nose and larynx. In contrast, excess risks of tongue, other oral cavity subsites, pharyngeal, oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancers were observed among clerical (SIRs 1.05–1.16), skilled workers (1.04–1.14), unskilled workers (1.16–1.26) and economically inactive men (1.38–1.87). Among women, no risk gradient similar to that in men was revealed. Conclusions The current study underscores the influence of SES on the incidence of HNCs and highlights the need for targeted interventions, including tobacco and alcohol control policies, and improved access to healthcare services, particularly for socio-economically disadvantaged populations.
dc.description.abstractSocio-economic status and head and neck cancer incidence in the Nordic countries
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleSocio-economic status and head and neck cancer incidence in the Nordic countries
dc.title.alternativeSocio-economic status and head and neck cancer incidence in the Nordic countries
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber1-11
dc.source.volume53
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ije/dyae104
dc.identifier.cristin2289748
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record